unhelpful |
Barnet | London | % | Status | |
New Appeals | 21 | 628 | 3 | Below average |
Won | Out of | % | ||
Cases heard | 18 | 30 | 60 | Above average |
So numbers of new Appeals were down by a quarter but the success rate for motorists was the correct side of 50%.
There were 4 cases to tell you about:
- A 1 minute observation period was found to be inadequate. This is often the case where the driver has to fetch a permit or driver from a nearby property & the person who is providing the same is slow, disabled, elderly etc. There is no absolute right to an observation period, it all depends upon the circumstances of the case. There is now, of course, an Eric Pickles inspired 10 minute grace period after paid for time.
- A cloned vehicle should not lead to a PCN being pursued all the way to PATAS as often seems to be the case in Barnet. All the council are doing by delaying is hacking off the motorist and losing £40 in PATAS fees.
- There are bays marked with orange lines in the Woodhouse Car Park (& others). Beware of them as they are a natural trap. One expects bays in car parks to be for people to pay to park in; the orange ones are for permit holders. In the rain one could easily miss the subtle distinction.
- A driver who was trying to pay by phone reported that the traffic warden was unhelpful. Who would believe it? oh, the PATAS adjudicator. the PCN was cancelled as were the other 3 mentioned above.
Keep those Appeals coming.
Yours appealingly
Miss Feezance.
No comments:
Post a Comment